 |
Minutes Archive |
|
|
Board of
Commissioners Minutes
CALHOUN COUNTY
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
August 3, 2006
The Regular Session of the Calhoun County Board of
Commissioners convened at 7:00 p.m., Thursday, August 3, 2006 in the
Commissioners' Meeting Room, County Building, Marshall, Michigan.
Roll Call: Present: Comrs. Bolger, Miller, Moore,
Segal, Solis, Strowbridge and Todd.
INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
A Moment of Personal Prayer was observed; followed by
the Pledge of Allegiance, led by Comr. Strowbridge.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA/ADDENDUM:
“Motion by Comr. Solis, supported by Comr. Todd,
adopt the following: Resolved by the Calhoun County Board of
Commissioners approve the August 3, 2006 agenda and addendum, as
amended, with deletion of Items 12.A. (3) -- FY 2007 Title IV
Cooperative Reimbursement Contract and 12.A. (4) -- FY 2007 Victim
Services Grant Contract.”
Voice Vote: Motion CARRIED
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
“Motion by Comr. Moore, supported by Comr.
Strowbridge, adopt the following: Resolved by the Calhoun County Board
of Commissioners approve the June 1, 2006 and July 6, 2006 minutes as
presented.”
Voice Vote: Motion CARRIED
“Motion by Comr. Bolger, supported by Comr.
Strowbridge, adopt the following: Resolved by the Calhoun County Board
of Commissioners table the May 18, 2006, June 15, 2006 and July 20,
2006 minutes until the August 17, 2006 Board of Commissioners
Meeting.”
Voice Vote: Motion CARRIED
SPECIAL ORDER OF BUSINESS:
Farmland Preservation Program Ordinance Amendment Public Hearing
Planning Consultant Jennifer Bomba stated that in
2003 the Board approved the ordinance that created the Calhoun County
Farmland Preservation Program and established the framework for the
Agricultural Preservation Board, including the membership. Ms. Bomba
advised that the Agricultural Preservation Board has been working since
2003 to develop the Program and has found two items within the ordinance
that the Board believes should be amended. The first deals with
membership on the Agricultural Preservation Board. Ms. Bomba advised
that currently the ordinance allows for an elected township official to
sit on that Board. The Agricultural Preservation Board has had a vacancy
for two years when the initial township official did not seek
reelection. Ms. Bomba advised that the Agricultural Preservation Board
suggests amending the ordinance to allow for a township representative
to sit on the Board, pointing out that when the ordinance was created
the intent was to have someone from a local planning commission which
would allow the Board to capture some money from the local planning
commission and would make a better liaison back to the township for this
Program.
Ms. Bomba continued that the other item involves the
method for which the Agricultural Preservation Board will determine the
value of the development rights. Currently the ordinance only allows for
a point based appraisal system, which in the infancy of the Program the
Agricultural Preservation Board is finding out that the Board does not
have the adequate base value to create that formula to arrive at an
accurate development rights value. Ms. Bomba advised that the
Agricultural Preservation Board proposes a state certified appraiser or
the points based appraisal system be used whereby when there is adequate
base values, the Agricultural Preservation Board will be able to use the
points based appraisal system.
Comr. Todd inquired how the township representative
shall be selected. Ms. Bomba responded that the Agricultural
Preservation Board’s bylaws call for a person to apply through the
county’s appointment procedures. Ms. Bomba advised that there is an
application available on-line whereby someone can apply. The application
would come before the Agricultural Preservation Board that would provide
its recommendation to the Board of Commissioners for appointment to the
Agricultural Preservation Board. Ms. Bomba advised that the Agricultural
Preservation Board is aware of some individuals interested and once the
ordinance is amended shall direct them to apply.
Comr. Strowbridge inquired whether the state
certified appraiser shall be a representative of the township where the
particular property is located or whether a county state certified
appraiser shall be appointed. Ms. Bomba responded that the Agricultural
Preservation Board has consulted with the state and the Michigan
Department of Agriculture has a list of certified state appraisers who
have knowledge of the agricultural field; therefore, it would probably
be someone from that list that Board would consult and typically the
Board would be looking for someone from this area.
Comr. Strowbridge inquired how the appraiser’s
services shall be paid for. Ms. Bomba responded that at this time there
is no funding to pay for an appraiser and that the Agricultural
Preservation Board is not at the point to do anything with a state
certified appraiser. Ms. Bomba advised that at the point when the
appraiser is required the Agricultural Preservation Board has some
support coming in from the townships and farm related agencies and
organizations that have indicated their willingness to donate money for
the initial start up of the Program. Comr. Strowbridge requested
clarification of whether the Agricultural Preservation Board shall be
responsible for paying for the state certified appraiser. Ms. Bomba
responded “Yes, absolutely.”
Res. 121-2006
“Motion by Comr. Bolger, supported by Comr.
Strowbridge, adopt the following: Resolved by the Calhoun County Board
of Commissioners declare the Farmland Preservation Program Ordinance
Amendment Public Hearing open for public comment.”
Voice Vote: Motion CARRIED
The public hearing commenced at 7:13 p.m. No public
comments were received.
Res. 121-A-2006
“Motion by Comr. Solis, supported by Comr. Segal,
adopt the following: Resolved by the Calhoun County Board of
Commissioners close the Farmland Preservation Program Ordinance
Amendment Public Hearing.”
Voice Vote: Motion CARRIED
The public hearing concluded at 7:14 p.m.
CONSENT AGENDA:
Res. 122-2006
“Motion by Comr. Todd, supported by Comr. Bolger,
adopt the following: Resolved by the Calhoun County Board of
Commissioners approve the following August 3, 2006 Consent Agenda as
presented:
- Petitions, Communications, Reports:
| (1) |
Resolution received
from St. Joseph County opposing House Bill No. 5924 {Community
Mental Health System Programs Consolidation}. (Referred to the
Legislative Liaisons, with a copy remitted to Summit Pointe
C.E.O. Ervin Brinker) |
| |
|
| (2) |
Resolutions
received from Muskegon County {1} opposing the Michigan Civil
Rights Initiative to amend Article 1 of the Michigan
Constitution, and {2} supporting restoration of state revenue
sharing. (Referred to the Legislative Liaisons) |
| |
|
| (3) |
Resolution received
from Antrim County urging the Legislature to include counties in
economic development decisions and eligibility for economic
tools proposed for cities, townships and villages under proposed
legislation. (Referred to the Legislative Liaisons, with a copy
remitted to Calhoun County Economic Development Corporation
President William Stoffer) |
| |
|
| (4) |
Notice of a public
hearing scheduled for August 1, 2006 regarding adoption of a
Brownfield Plan for land situated at 115-121 West Michigan
Avenue and 15 Carlyle Street, Battle Creek, Michigan 49017
received from Battle Creek City. (Received and placed on file,
with a copy remitted to Equalization Director David Lee) |
| |
|
| (5) |
Copy of a
communication remitted to Mr. Jeffery Merrild, Albion resident,
received from the Michigan Department of Agriculture advising
that the complaint against his farm operation shall be
classified as not verified and the file will be closed.
(Received and placed on file, with a copy remitted to
Environmental Health Director Ted Havens, Manure Management
Specialist Natalie Rector and Drain Commissioner Blaine
VanSickle)” |
Voice Vote: Motion CARRIED
PETITIONS AND NEW BUSINESS:
County Administrator/Controller’s Report
Highway Safety Grant Application for Click it
or Ticket and You Drink & Drive, You Lose Programs
County Administrator/Controller Greg Purcell advised
that the grant shall provide funding to cover the deputies’ overtime
wages for the Click it or Ticket and the You Drink & Drive, You Lose
Programs. No match is required for the grant in the amount of $25,000.
Mr. Purcell stated that the grant is a cooperative effort with the
Albion Department of Public Safety and the Marshall Police Department.
Res. 123-2006
“Motion by Comr. Segal, supported by Comr. Moore,
adopt the following: Resolved by the Calhoun County Board of
Commissioners authorize the Office of the Sheriff to electronically
submit the Highway Safety Grant Application in the amount of $25,000
for the grant year October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007 which
will enable the Office of the Sheriff to coordinate enforcement and
public information activities. Click it or Ticket is a statewide
enforcement and public information effort to enforce the mandatory
safety belt usage laws. You Drink & Drive, You Lose is a national
enforcement educational campaign to warn motorists about the dangers
of drinking and driving.”
Comr. Strowbridge advised that he shall abstain from
voting since the Department with which he is employed will benefit in
some way from the funds derived from the grant.
| Roll call vote: |
Yes - 6 (Comrs. Todd, Bolger, Miller,
Moore, Segal and Solis) |
| |
Abstain - 1 (Comr. Strowbridge) |
| |
Motion CARRIED |
Highway Safety Grant Application for the Youth Alcohol
Enforcement Program
Mr. Purcell stated that the application is for
another Highway Safety Grant to commence October 1 in the amount of
$17,500 for the Youth Alcohol Enforcement Program. Mr. Purcell advised
that the grant application is due to be submitted electronically by
August 15.
Res. 124-2006
“Motion by Comr. Segal, supported by Comr. Moore,
adopt the following: Resolved by the Calhoun County Board of
Commissioners authorize the Office of the Sheriff to electronically
submit the Highway Safety Grant Application in the amount of $17,500
for the grant year October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007 for
youth alcohol enforcement.”
Roll call vote: Yes - 7 Motion CARRIED Unanimously
CITIZENS’ TIME:
Mr. Gardy Berezonsky, Marengo Township resident,
noted that the Fair Office is listed under county departments within the
County Directory and inquired whether the Fair Office is a county
department. Mr. Purcell responded No.
Mr. Berezonsky advised that he is making a citizen’s
complaint against the person who was operating the vehicle with license
plate number 004 on July 26 at approximately 8:30 a.m. Mr. Berezonsky
stated that he observed that vehicle running a stop light at the corner
of Green and Grand Street in Marshall, and wants the complaint to be
placed in that person’s personnel file. Mr. Berezonsky advised that he
went to the Sheriff Department on the day the incident occurred, and the
first thing the Department inquired was whether he was sure that the
incident was not committed by someone from the Marshall Police
Department, to which he advised that he wrote the license plate number
down. Mr. Berezonsky continued that someone from the Sheriff Department
then went outside to look for that license plate number and did not even
know who had that vehicle.
Mr. Berezonsky advised that he shall leave his
complaint with Corporation Counsel tonight after the Board meeting.
Mr. Chris Dubois, Battle Creek resident, advised that
he is present solely as a citizen tonight as he resigned from Community
Corrections this afternoon and faxed his resignation to the County
Administrator/Controller.
Mr. Dubois stated that he is really frustrated and
could talk for hours regarding why. Mr. Dubois advised that back in
December 2005 on the 11th hour in order to circumvent layoffs within the
Sheriff Department, a promise was made to start a tether program that
would generate nearly $100,000. Mr. Dubois stated that at that time he
was very eager to do that as previously he operated a tether program
within the Sheriff Department which made money. Mr. Dubois stated that
the program could have worked, and that many programs can work within
Community Corrections, pointing out that Kalamazoo receives millions of
dollars for their Community Corrections Department and is self-funding
themselves. Mr. Dubois continued that the key in the western side of the
state is the Michigan Prisoner Reentry Act. Those counties have lots of
money coming in and are doing things with it.
Mr. Dubois advised that Community Corrections
receives a large grant from the state annually and literally does
nothing with it. Mr. Dubois implored Board members to get involved,
pointing out that all of that state funding is going to disappear. Mr.
Dubois stated that the county needs to address a system to eliminate the
in-fighting between the Circuit Court, District Court, the judges,
Community Corrections and the Sheriff Department. Mr. Dubois stated that
it is “twisted” to the point where Jail Population Committee members sit
in the meetings and say the same things, advising that he as been with
the Sheriff Department for ten years and nothing productive has come of
addressing the jail population. Mr. Dubois stated that the situation is
a huge problem that fails to be addressed because of politics.
Mr. Dubois addressed successful programs; e.g. the
Friend of the Court Program, stating that programs can work if
communication is there; however if the communication is not and an
agency like Community Corrections is allowed to exist without adequate
supervision, nothing can be accomplished.
Mr. Dubois admitted that he is part of the “dead
weight” in this county that has been drawing off the county’s budget.
Mr. Dubois advised that since January he has taken a month leave of
absence to go to New Orleans with his second job with the Department of
Homeland Security, plus took a month off on sick and accident because he
was thoroughly disgusted when he met with the Sheriff who advised him
that there is no “buy-in” to the tether program by the courts.
Mr. Dubois addressed the contract with Immigration,
advising that he worked with the Department of Homeland Security as a
contracted employee at the Federal Center and in April the staff had
three days notification to cut the staff in half. Mr. Dubois pointed out
that the funding is Department of Homeland Security money. Mr. Dubois
stated that kind of decision can be made with the contract to house
inmates. Mr. Dubois continued that the county has been riding that fat
hog for too long and needs to venture out and start community programs
to find money to address the jail population within the community.
COMMISSIONERS’ TIME:
Comr. Segal reminded all county employees and Board
members that August 12 is the county’s annual employees picnic. Comr.
Segal advised that the Employee Recognition and Relations Committee has
been doing fund raising to help with the cost of the picnic, and
requested donations from Board members to assist in helping to provide
the entertainment for the children this year.
Chairman Miller advised that this is the last Board
meeting prior to the August 8 primary election and encouraged everyone
to vote. Chairman Miller reminded everyone that they cannot split their
ticket.
CLAIMS PAYABLE LISTINGS:
Res. 125-2006
“Motion by Comr. Bolger, supported by Comr. Solis,
adopt the following: Resolved by the Calhoun County Board of
Commissioners approve payment of the list of claims against the county
in the total amount of $293,674.91 for the week of July 19, 2006;
further, approve payment of the list of claims against the county in
the total amount of $908,678.32 for the week of July 25, 2006.”
Roll call vote: Yes - 7 Motion CARRIED Unanimously
ANNOUNCEMENTS:
Comr. Solis announced that the Village of Homer is
having their annual Hogstravaganza beginning this Friday with a dinner
at 5:00 p.m. and a parade and all day long events on Saturday, and
encouraged everyone to attend.
Mr. Purcell advised that Administration did the
survey with the Health Department and shall be doing a presentation to
Commissioners in the future. Mr. Purcell stated that the survey asked
questions regarding the senior millage and came back with 58 percent
support of the general public showing substantial support for the
proposition on the ballot.
RECESS:
The Board recessed at 7:28 p.m. at the call of the Chair.
|