 |
Minutes Archive |
|
|
Board of Health
Minutes
Calhoun County Board of Health
Meeting Minutes
March 15, 2004
ATTENDANCE
| Board of Health |
Larry Anderson |
| |
Byron MacDonald |
| |
Ben Miller |
| |
Jeff Mitchell |
| |
George Perrett |
| Health Department |
Kathy Ferguson |
| |
Ginger Hentz |
| |
Heidi Oberlin |
| |
Brigette Reichenbaugh |
| County |
Jim Latham |
| |
Nancy Mullett |
The meeting was called to order at 8:05 a.m. by Larry Anderson.
Larry added one added agenda item, the proposed 75 cent increase in
the State’s tobacco tax. This addition was approved by Ben Miller and
seconded by Jeff Mitchell.
Nancy Mullet also added a change/clarification to the meeting
minutes: All closed session meeting minutes should be kept on file for
one year. Jeff moved. All in favor.
FINANCIAL REPORT
Kathy summarized the financial report. In response to a request from
a Board member, dollar amounts have been added to the financial summary.
She reported that currently, we have an excess of revenue over expenses
that includes Nursing Clinic donations from last year. The remaining
revenue consists of items where payment is received in advance and has
not yet been spent. Budget revisions are necessary at this time. They
are due to the State by June 2, 2004. Therefore, the BOH must approve
the revised budget by May 17 in order for the revisions to be presented
at the BOC meeting on May 20.
Jim Latham asked in terms of the HCAP grant, what further
developments do we see? Since the time the original budget was
developed, the need for minor revisions to salary and other expenses
have become apparent. Kathy responded that these adjustments will be
included in the entire budget adjustment which will be presented to the
BOH on May 17.
BOARD BUSINESS
Bylaws discussion.
Article II:
(4) The decision to continue the Annual Report will be made by the
Health Department. It is not mandatory that the Annual Report be
presented to the BOC by the Health Board Chair. Health Officer can
present.
(5) There should be a mechanism for the Health Department to report
quarterly to the BOC. Something more in depth than presented at the BOH.
Can delete the formal quarterly report but should have some type of
reporting.
(6) Delete.
(7) There is discussion about revision of the current process.
(8) Duplication of number (4). Delete.
Article III:
Section I: The quantity of Board members should not be in question.
The question should be: Are the individuals committed to the Health
Department mission and the Board of Health? The quantity of members
should be included in the attendance policy. Staggering representation
is a great idea and will resolve when the quantity item is resolved.
Article IV:
Section I: The BOC designates the terms limitations for their Board
(e.g., the Chair is a two year term; the Vice Chair is set at one year).
Section II: Can the Health Officer sign contracts at a specific
dollar amount? Nancy suggested that yes, she can; however, that will
eliminate the BOH viewing the contracts. Nancy didn’t recommend it,
however, certainly can be done.
Article V:
Section 1: Does the BOH need to dictate “Robert’s Rule of Order?” No,
they do not. Another model can be followed; however, the BOC does use
“Robert’s Rule of Order.”
Section 4. Regarding meeting minutes, the minimum amount of detail is
required for compliance. The detailed Health Department minutes are good
as they are and should be used only for a reference (detail). Summarized
minutes may be used for posting. Larry suggested that we include the
minimum requirement when posting, keep extensive detail on file.
Article VII:
Section 2: All funds are to be deposited to the Treasurer. When there
is a fund balance, they give and receive money from each individual
department. Jim feels that it is not appropriate for the Health
Department to build a large fund balance when other departments operate
in a deficit.
Article VIII:
Standing committees. Nancy recommended that we delete the entire
section.
Article VIII:
Still need BOC approval involving money.
Larry asked the Board how they would like to proceed on bylaws. Larry
suggested that Larry, Nancy, and Heidi draft the revised bylaws and
present to the BOH for review and comment. Mac would like to see other
department bylaws for a sample. Board members agreed.
George commented on Article V, Section 5 regarding conflict of
interest: We are representatives of the citizenry by direct appointment
of the BOH. I think we need to be. He stated that having conflicts of
interest prevent a public official should be the exception, not the
rule; instead, officials should disclose the nature of any possible
conflict. The public expects that the BOH acts. He urges that we need to
be very particular and very direct about what constitutes a conflict.
Remove item number 5, however, the other pieces should be kept in.
George used the example that if he had stock in Gentiva, should he
recuse himself from voting when it directly affects his family. If
George cannot participate in a vote, then do we have a quorum? Disclose
the conflict? Need to represent the public and when a conflict arises,
they need to recuse themselves.
Ben suggested that it be left to the Board’s discretion. The issue is
disclosure not the vote. Be very specific. Need to tailor the conflict
rule to the public.
Nominating committee report: We accept the resignation of Patricia
West with regret. In anticipation of her resignation, a nominating
committee (George Perrett, Ben Miller, and Larry Anderson) was put
together. The BOC were asked for input. Larry spoke to Barbara
Fredericks, commissioner for the Albion area. Barbara recommended Harry
Bonner. He is interested in joining. Ken Ponds, chaplain at Starr
Commonwealth was also recommended. Ken is on the Regional Health Board
and very active in the community. Harry was previously a Board member
and runs a business in the Albion area. Both are interested in serving.
Ben suggested that since both are interested and could commitment to the
Board, Larry should ask them both to send a bio for the Board’s review.
George suggested that we invite them both to come to the next meeting
which may give them a better view of how the BOH operates. Larry will
ask them for their bios and invite them to the next meeting.
Heidi reported on the Nursing Clinic of Battle Creek PCER report.
Heidi passed out the summarized PCER report and the governance structure
recommendation. The Health Department was aware of many of the
suggestions/recommendations that were discussed during the exit
interview. Many things have been implemented (i.e., membership in the
Primary Care Association). We are obtaining software that allows us to
track patients and billing issues. Our fees are based upon reasonable
fees to obtain care, but the suggestion was that we base our charges on
actual cost, and then reduce the charges based on the patient’s ability
to pay. If the indirect cost rate is not formally approved, we could
charge the amount of time we spend on administration directly to the
NCBC. Federal reviewers thought it was “odd” that we don’t bill the
grant for the administrative time spent on the NCBC. By May 1, Heidi
must present a letter and plan to the feds on recommendations and how we
will proceed. The governance recommendation presented to the BOH is the
federal document, not a summarized version. The feds recognize this
Board as the governance over the NCBC and the NCBC Board will be an
advisory Board. Heidi will give Nancy the federal requirements for
governance and the official letter received from the feds. These
documents have not been presented to any others. Larry and Heidi will be
meeting with Phil Ptacin, John Collins, and Chris Christ to share the
governance recommendations with them.
Jeff asked where the NCBC stands on the malpractice issue. There is
governmental immunity. The county has liability insurance for all
employees. There is state legislation that protects the volunteer
physicians. The nurses are covered. There is some federal protection
dependent upon the type of service. Once the NCBC becomes a federally
qualified health center, we will be protected just as the FHC is.
Heidi also updated the BOH on the NCBC medical director position
recruitment. We do have a few leads on the medical director position. We
need a medical director in order to bill.
Heidi presented the patient profile report requested by Jeff. Due to
discrepancies in the data, the data indicates that we have no “40” year
olds. Many questions in data.
Regarding the Minority Health Partnership, Heidi will be receiving
the financial information for the MHP from Brenda Hunt as early as
today. This is not a “done” deal until the details are discussed. Ben
suggested that Heidi and Larry sit down with Marvin Austin and Greg
Purcell to discuss ramifications of county dollars. Heidi stated that
there was a meeting scheduled with the three of them, however, the
meeting was cancelled by Marvin. Jeff asked if we shift the MHP to the
Health Department, what are the time requirements and the monetary
pieces. Is it completely funded? If not, what is the impact on current
programs? Heidi stated that there are two staff members to come along
with the MHP. The union issues, county hiring procedures, etc. have been
resolved.
Ends policies: Do we want to have a resolution for support of the
state tobacco tax. Larry passed out the MALPH resolution that was
presented last week. George moved to support after modification (remove
MALPH wherever mentioned). Ben supported. Motion passed.
Meeting adjourned at 9:45 a.m.
|