 |
Minutes Archive |
|
|
Board of Health
Minutes
Calhoun County Board of Health
Meeting Minutes
May 17, 2004
| ATTENDANCE |
|
| |
|
| Board of Health |
Larry Anderson |
| |
Jean Cook-Hughes |
| |
Byron McDonald |
| |
Ben Miller |
| |
Jeffrey Mitchell |
| |
George Perrett |
| |
|
| Health Department |
Kathy Ferguson |
| |
Greg Harrington |
| |
Heidi Oberlin |
| |
Brigette Reichenbaugh |
| |
|
| Calhoun County |
Greg Purcell |
| |
|
| Other |
Harry Bonner, Minority Program Services |
| |
Brenda Hunt, President, Battle Creek Community
Foundation |
The meeting was called to order at 8:00 a.m. by Larry Anderson. The
following three items were added to the agenda:
- Medical Director’s Report
- Leave of absence for nutritionist
- Agreement for interim nurse practitioner
Motion to approve the agenda: Jean moved. Jeff supported.
Larry motioned for approval of the April 19, 2004 meeting minutes.
Jean moved. George supported.
FINANCIAL REPORT
Kathy summarized the financial report. Currently, the reports
indicate a net loss of approximately $115,000. We are expecting funds
from FIA of approximately $87,000. Funds from Baldwin Schools were
received the first week in May of approximately $67,000. We requested
$31,000 from the State WIC program and approximately $1,200 for the
Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program (BCCCP). The BCCCP funds
require approval by the State and will require a budget
adjustment/amendment to the contract. Budget adjustments will be
presented at the June Board of Health meeting. At that time, we will
present the adjusted budget to the Board of Commissioners. A Board
member inquired about the overtime figure. Heidi stated that the
overtime is related primarily to two employees, due to the inability to
fill nurse positions. All school nurse positions were filled since
mid-March and the vacant part-time nurse position in the Nursing Clinic
will be filled within a week or 2.
MEDICAL DIRECTOR REPORT
Dr. Greg Harrington updated the Board on several medical issues:
1) A communication will be sent to the jail physician regarding
follow-up of positive Tuberculosis skin tests to ensure that there is
appropriate follow up.
2) The Student Health Center State Review. The State of Michigan audited
the Student Health Center. The program was received very positively.
Other than a few suggestions, we passed with flying colors.
3) Chicken Pox within grade schools in Calhoun County. We saw a lot of
chicken pox rash issues in the grade schools. It seems to be partially
due to the vaccine-induced virus.
In regards to the TB, Greg Purcell will follow-up on the jail’s
response as needed. The problem is that for those inmates who do not
stay in the jail, we have no control of the patient taking their
medication. Greg P. asked for a copy of the letter sent to the Sheriff.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REPORT
Ted sent out notices of the Public Hearing for the revisions to the
sanitation code. The public hearings will occur on May 19, 20, and 26,
2004. The formal hearing will be held on Monday, June 21, 2004 at the
Board of Health meeting.
MINORITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP REPORT
Larry introduced Brenda Hunt, President of the Battle Creek Community
Foundation (BCCF). Per Greg Purcell’s suggestion, Heidi invited Harry
Bonner and Brenda Hunt to discuss the Minority Health Partnership (MHP)
transition from the BCCF to the Health Department.
Brenda stated that the Health Department (HD) is one of the BCCF’s
top three partners. The BCCF is trying to locate the best place to
transition the MHP within Calhoun County. The transition, along with the
program itself, includes two employees. If, once the transition occurs,
the HD does not have a full-time position available for one of the two
employees, the BCCF offered her a full-time position. Due to a 20%
markup in salaries for those two individuals (Employment Group
employees), program ups and downs, and a change in two BCCF officers,
including the finance officer, Brenda stated that obtaining staff
figures is quite difficult. Brenda stated that the HD currently is very
organized with their budget numbers, however, in the past, the HD was
not completely trusted with budget numbers and operations. That is one
reason the MHP was placed within the BCCF.
Mac stated that previously the HD obtained $50,000 to start the
program.
Brenda stated that the BCCF did not start the program, but they did
take it over. Last time they discussed the merger, the previous Health
Officer could not account for $13,000 of BCCF funds, evidently used
elsewhere.
Harry stated that the MHP was created from the Healthy People 2000
initiative. Harry feels that the reason the MHP should be put back into
the Health arena is because of the MHP’s mission, that’s essentially a
public health mission. The reason why it wasn’t originally operated
through the HD was due to leadership having challenges in how to
institutionalize it in the HD. The bottom line was the leadership at
that time was unable to make recommendations to the BOH and the BOC. The
HD didn’t want to have ownership with it. Because of the dedication of
the BCCF and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation (WKKF), the MHP was kept alive.
Numerous meetings were conducted to discuss how to run it. There is no
issue of resources but the HD leadership was previously not capable of
operating the MHP.
Larry stated that going back to those days of the RHA, the HD was
insular in terms of public health planning. We didn’t get that involved
in the community and the communitywide/countywide planning that has
significantly changed within the most recent years.
Harry: Even though the HD was present, they were never considered the
leader of the discussion. They didn’t want that role, but it was still a
public health initiative as it is now. The Healthy People 2000 issue was
out there, but the HD never pursued the issue. What is the HD’s role in
the MHP? It isn’t the role of the BCCF; the BCCF is to fund programs and
donate to other organizations. The HD is directly involved in
communitywide health and public health issues.
George: When we allotted the $50,000 we felt the MHP was a public
health issue. $50,000 was viewed as seed money, not operational money.
There was a great amount of thought put into the MHP as a public health
concern and should receive top priority. Have other organizations
expressed an interest in running the MHP?
Brenda stated that yes, at one time, other organizations outside
Calhoun County have. At one time, Legacy Enterprises expressed an
interest. Brenda stated that they spent about eight months in
negotiations with Legacy and turned the offer down.
George: Because it is a public health priority, we cannot isolate
those health issues to people of color (e.g., diabetes, heart, etc.).
George feels that it is part of our commitment to assume and mantle the
transition of this program. He feels the BOH has not identified with the
health priorities related to people of color and feels that it’s time
the BOH assumes the mantle of leadership with this program.
Mac asked about the BCCF’s relationship with the MHP. Brenda stated
that the BCCF tries to make it look like it’s the MHP, not a program
within the BCCF. Also, the concept was that the BCCF and HD were sharing
an employee with RHA that provided a link with the MHP.
Ben: Certainly appreciates the historical background on the MHP. Ben
is considering the potential costs into the future and frankly the
timeline is far too quick.
Heidi: What we are proposing to do is to present a contract in June
to redefine the relationship with the BCCF in regards to the MHP.
Brenda asked Ben if it would help if the BCCF wrote a letter, after
the numbers are presented, that the BCCF will provide support to the HD
for the MHP.
Ben: Appreciates that we are easing into it, but there is no
guarantee that in four years the County will be able to support the
program.
George: In terms of policy issue, concern and review is strictly
limited to budget. Policy concern is by your exercise of this discretion
related to this Board. If the BCCF is helping us fund the program, he
feels the funding is not going to change. In that case, we are forced to
look at other means of funding the program, in part by a commitment by
the BCCF, reorganization of funds here so there are dollars committed to
they MHP. It is a public health issue and it ranks high, or at least
should, with this Health Department. If we have a community partner that
will help bank roll this program, then we should do it.
Mac: Very supportive of George’s comments and that the MHP should be
within the HD.
Jean: Glad to hear the history. Agree with George entirely that this
is where the program should be. She also agrees with Ben that we should
see all the commitment we can get. Things do change, but let’s at least
get it where it should be and face the rest of it when the time comes.
You can’t make anything forever, there is nothing for sure. Let’s get as
much commitment from the Foundation and other organizations.
Harry stated that he left the Board to work with minority health
issues and policy at the State, where there was little effort in these
areas. The Minority Health has been set as a priority for the year.
Agrees with Jean also, but as a Board the responsibility of figuring it
out is why the Board members are on the Health Board. All health issues
are the responsibility of the BOH. If money and funding is not the
issue, then what is the issue?
Ben: There is no argument with the issue and a focus or portion of
the HD/public health within the county. The fundamental problem is that
there is a lot of talk that money is not a problem. He sees no long-term
cost in the information presented.
Brenda asked how long he would like funds projected.
Greg P. answered: four years.
Brenda stated that if it will become a problem or large political
issue, they will pull it because of staff issues and commitments. Brenda
stated that we need to get the discussion/transition in progress. They
are holding up staff members, advisory Board structure, etc.
Greg P. stated that there are four issues:
1. Government Structure – who’s the government body (Brenda answered
that it will be restructured once it gets to the HD, currently on hold).
Greg stated that we need the structure set before it comes to the HD.
2. Timing issue.
3. Budget.
4. Need to deal with the Union issue in terms of these positions.
Jeff would also like to see how it fits into the strategic plan of
the health department.
Jean: Is the four years negotiable.
Brenda: The BCCF has a $500,000 commitment from the hospital. There
is no way the BCCF can let a program that deals with health disparities
go. Health disparities will not go away in four years, we would be
hard-pressed not support this program.
Mac moved and Jean supported the concept that the MHP be moved under
the HD.
Brenda stated that when she writes the letter it will be a commitment
from the BCCF not her personally.
Kathy: There is $50,500 that we will be receiving, passing through to
the BCCF for this FY.
All in favor. Passed unanimously.
RESOLUTIONS
Resolution 11-2004: Leave of absence from a nutritionist,
Barbara Clute, WIC. This is a win win situation. Greg moved. Ben
supported. Currently is a part-time position, but once she returns and
with the state increase, it will become a fulltime position.
Resolution 12-2004: Family Planning/BCCCP physician agreement.
Staff member has requested to take leave to take care of terminally ill
family member. Ben moved and George supported pending Nancy Mullet’s
review.
OTHER
A Nursing Clinic of Battle Creek meeting is scheduled for tomorrow to
clarify the role between the BOH, the advisory group, and the
fundraising committee. Larry, Heidi, Dr. Phil Ptacin, Dr. John Collins,
John Harper, and Betty and Chris Christ will attend.
We will be working very closely with Nancy Mullett on BOH bylaws,
NCBC advisory council, and MHP. Fortunately we didn’t rush into the
formation of a NCBC advisory council too quickly because of NCBC federal
recommendations.
George asked if Nancy Mullett is still looking at bylaws and is she
to develop a draft for BOH review? If we could also set these policy
statements for review, discuss and review one policy review per meeting.
Larry: we will develop a calendar to address the schedule and are
working with Erv to bring back policies to the Board.
George suggested that at least two Board members review a policy each
month and report suggestion at the next meeting.
Greg P. updated the BOH on the County building in Albion. The FIA
will be presenting at the next BOC meeting on the decision to relocate
FIA staff to the Toeller Building. They are expected to save approx
$100,000 in building and security. The county will have a building that
will be significantly underutilized and needs to evaluate its use.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:35 a.m.
|